Need help scaling down a model

Discussion in 'SolidWorks' started by amylabritto, Jul 10, 2007.

  1. amylabritto

    amylabritto Guest

    Will someone please help me in my dumbness. Not all that long ago, I
    made a model of a blanking die, 4 X the actual size that I needed. I
    now need it of course 4 X smaller and I cannot reduce by 4X, only
    enlarge by 4X. I am assuming that the parameters would be 4:1 to
    enlarge, and 1:4 to diminish? I am missing something basic here in the
    technique, and I really would appreciate someone reacting to this plea
    with a step by step on the sequence required to diminish. I am using
    SWX 2007.
    Love this forum, by the way, I have learned so much from you guys,
    that I feel guilty not being at a level that I can contribute. Yet,
    anyway.
    Thanks in advance,
    Amy Labritto
     
    amylabritto, Jul 10, 2007
    #1
  2. In the part model,
    Insert>Features>scale
    enter value of .25

    Note that none of the model dimensions will imported (insert>model
    items) into the drawing will show this scaled down model (you will
    have to use driven dims created in the drawing)
    Ed
     
    Edward T Eaton, Jul 10, 2007
    #2
  3. amylabritto

    amylabritto Guest

    Thank you very much, Sir. Your concern is much appreciated.
    Amy Labritto
     
    amylabritto, Jul 10, 2007
    #3
  4. Amy,

    Ed made an assumption that the model in question is only a part file, and
    did sort of state that assumption, but you may not have caught it. If it's
    an assy, then things are not quite as simple in that the scale feature only
    works on parts, so you would have to scale each part individually and then
    make any necessary adjustments in the assy to put things back where they
    belong.

    If your model is in fact just a part file, then great. If not, then I
    didn't want you to get frustrated because you couldn't get it to work.

    By the way - why did you originally model it 4x too large?

    WT
     
    Wayne Tiffany, Jul 10, 2007
    #4
  5. amylabritto

    amylabritto Guest

    Well that is a comedy of errors in and of itself. It is a profile
    line drawing of a very complicated nature, (multi electronic
    contacts), and the Pantograph Engraver needed a printout exactly 4
    times the actual size so that he could engrave a master pattern for
    the Pantograph, and then he could use that 4 times larger pattern, set
    his ratio at 4, and engrave right through a thin piece of Berillium
    Copper, (.017"), with a small faced cutter to make an extremely clean
    and accurate profile of the blank needed to make the prototype, that
    needed to be drawn up and bent at all sorts of angles, tiny small
    diameter rolled contacts, male fork types etc, etc.
    I had issues, at that time, with my version of Autocad, (14, I
    think), in that the plotting section had a bug in it that would not
    allow me to plot in ratio, but it would allow me to plot 1 to 1.
    What was laughable about this, is the fact that because of the way we
    went about making the prototype, the client put the finished prototype
    under the scrutiny of a shadowgraph, saw the high quality, and he
    actually accused us of having the tool allready built and were
    charging him for a tool that we had in inventory. It's a case where
    this company was literally punished for seeking perfection in a
    prototype, which this company is known for, and enjoys the
    appropriate reputation.
    Thank you Mr Eaton, and thank you Mr Tiffany.
    Amy Labritto
     
    amylabritto, Jul 11, 2007
    #5
  6. amylabritto

    Engineer Guest

    Try working with design table and and use equation to define various
    dimensions. I wish then u will able to make configurations and hopw
    this will do the job as per ur requirements. Even also add relations
    of dimensions in the assy mode so that u don't have to change many
    parameters.

    regards

    Deepak
     
    Engineer, Jul 11, 2007
    #6
  7. amylabritto

    Anna Wood Guest

    Amy,

    The way I read your explanation of what happened, is your strip layout
    is 4X size, but the rest of your tool is modeled to the correct size,
    albeit designed to an oversized strip layout.

    Do you need to do is get your strip layout to the correct size? There
    are several ways to correct your problems, but the exact answers
    depend greatly on how you created your models; ie, how much in context
    stuff, etc. What is the master for your design, the strip layout I
    assume. You will need to use a combination of techniques, I suspect.

    You may not be able to just scale your parts down. What about holes,
    dowels and fasteners.. are those 4X to big? The guidance system for
    the die asm, are the guide posts to big or just in the wrong locations
    because your die shoes and major die components are oversized in the
    plan view of the tool. What about your shut height for the tool is
    that 4X to big? Do you see where I am heading with my questions. The
    scale feature will only help you to a point.

    If I am reading what your issues are correctly you have a big problem
    and there will be no magic bullet for you. Personally, I would be
    considering starting a new assembly and building it correctly. If you
    have to live with the tool design for any length of time you will
    always be annoyed to have to work on it because it is messed up. If
    you are sending this math data and drawings out to someone else to
    build, I would not want my name on the models for anyone else to see.

    Wish I could offer you an easy answer, but I think you are going to
    need to bit the bullet and make it right and chalk up your error to a
    big learning experience that you will probably remember for a very
    long time.

    Regards,

    Anna Wood
    http://designsmarter.typepad.com/solidmuse/
     
    Anna Wood, Jul 11, 2007
    #7
  8. amylabritto

    lipkink Guest

    I have the same problem as Amy, except I have to deal with a 100-some
    part assembly.

    The assembly is made of almost all imported geometry, and none of it
    lines up with orthogonal faces. It's all basically just fixed in
    space. Somehow it is now 62-some percent too large. Is there anyway
    I can make this thing into one big "part" (I don't mind losing all of
    my subassemblies) with multiple solids? Then I could scale the stupid
    thing, then go back to an assembly.

    Thanks + any other ideas?
     
    lipkink, Jul 17, 2007
    #8

  9. Sure, just "Save As" and pick "Part" in "Save as type:". Check the "All
    components" under "Assembly geometry to save in part file:".

    Jerry Steiger
    Tripod Data Systems
    "take the garbage out, dear"
     
    Jerry Steiger, Jul 17, 2007
    #9
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.