I'm sure this has been asked before...

Discussion in 'SolidWorks' started by Doug, Dec 17, 2003.

  1. Doug

    Doug Guest

    ....but would dual processors be of benefit to Solidworks? We're getting
    ready to start looking at purchasing a new system, and I'd like to know if
    anyone is seeing a performance increase from a "dualie". 8`) TIA
     
    Doug, Dec 17, 2003
    #1
  2. To my knowledge it is less than 10% improvement. If you do rendering I know
    that Photoworks does have quite a bit of improvement with a "dualie".
     
    Corey Scheich, Dec 17, 2003
    #2
  3. Unless you do other things (email, word processing, etc.) while in SW and SW
    is really using the CPU (FEA. photoworks) the gains do not justify the cost.
    I recently spoke to Greg Jankowski from SW and he stated installing a second
    hard drive dedicated to virtual memory was one of the greatest payoffs for
    performance per cost that most users overlook.

    Keith Streich
     
    Keith Streich, Dec 17, 2003
    #3
  4. Doug

    Michael Guest

    Hmmm--that's interesting. Can you offer any further specifics? I'm not
    clear on how (or why) this would help. Also--does HD#2 need to be anything
    special?
     
    Michael, Dec 17, 2003
    #4
  5. Well, what addons are you using? If you are using addon's like PW or
    FEA often,.. they should be worth it.
    If you are "not using addons" than the benefit for just SW alone is nil.

    If you are using other apps along with SW often, 2 or more cpu's should
    help but the balance of cost rewards is marginal.

    As someone mentioned, they offer a small margin of performance increase
    with normal use so if you do not use addons or the use of other apps
    along with SW, the trade off with the cost is minimal.

    Otherwise, invest in more memory, a faster harddrive and a higher end
    graphics card or if on a network, faster O/I connections.

    ...
     
    Paul Salvador, Dec 17, 2003
    #5
  6. I find this interesting as well because most of my data is all in system
    memory (not swapping) or not virtual memory (swapping) so a extra hdrive
    dedicated to virtual memory (swapping) is not going to help me or most
    users at all.

    This most likely has to do with users pushing more data than what the
    system memory can handle or they are swapping to the hdrive (virtual
    memory)? Also, this may be a networking issue or swapping data in/out
    via the network?

    Most of these issues would/should go away if MicroSoft made a decent OS
    or if SW Corp was not dependent on M$!?

    ...
     
    Paul Salvador, Dec 17, 2003
    #6
  7. We do not work off of our hard drives we don't have a PDM system. Would a
    second drive really help if we aren't really saving much to our harddrives
    anyway. How big of a hard drive are we talking and how fast.
     
    Corey Scheich, Dec 17, 2003
    #7
  8. We do not work off of our hard drives we don't have a PDM system. Would a
    second drive really help if we aren't really saving much to our harddrives
    anyway. How big of a hard drive are we talking and how fast.
     
    Corey Scheich, Dec 17, 2003
    #8
  9. Doug

    d Guest

    I'm running dual xeon 3.06 w/hyperthreading enabled at home. While I
    don't see any direct benefit to SoiledWorks(sp intentional), if you
    are running any other services or applications, there is a benefit in
    dedicating one CPU to SoiledWorks and the other to background
    tasks/services. Rendering pegs all four cpu meters.

    If given the choice, get every last drop of power you can.
     
    d, Dec 17, 2003
    #9
  10. Doug

    Jarocki Guest

    You'd better buy AMD 64-bit processor. Much more faster with new Win XP-64
    and the newest CAD programs.........
     
    Jarocki, Dec 18, 2003
    #10
  11. He was talking about how to increase performance if you didn't have 2 Gigs
    on board. As models of assemblies become more and more complex, virtual
    memory is becoming more of a factor until MS goes beyond a 3 Gig limit (I
    thinks it's 3 with XP pro, but you have to set a switch in boot.ini). He
    said a small, fast, cheap drive would make all the difference in the world
    (10 Gigs or so). His next article (January) is moving to Cadalyst (from
    Cadence) because of the merger and will address this performance issue.

    Keith
     
    Keith Streich, Dec 18, 2003
    #11

  12. This makes absolutely no sense to me. If you are hitting swap space at all,
    no matter how fast your disk is, you are going to be slowing down a lot.
    Buying more RAM is the answer, not a small, fast hard disk.

    Having said that, I still run into problems even though I have 1.5GB of RAM.
    Sometimes (say when trying to do a STEP translation of a relatively large
    assembly), SW will tell me it can't get any memory, even though I am at less
    than 1.5GB and have an additional 1.5GB of swap space available.

    Jerry Steiger
    Tripod Data Systems
     
    Jerry Steiger, Dec 18, 2003
    #12
  13. Doug

    Krister L Guest

    Jerry

    I think this is the same problem as the one I ran into when trying to render
    some pretty large pic's.
    MS can't handle more then 2 gigs of ram/application.....in reality somewhere
    between 1,5 to 1,7 GB. I have 2Gig ram on both my machines and I hit the
    roof at about 1,5-1,7 >Gig ...then Sw tells me it doesn't obtain enough
    memory....and I almost taired my hair off before I understood what was
    happening.... many thanks to Edward T Eaton who helped me off......but
    that's the limit I believe

    Krister L
     
    Krister L, Dec 31, 2003
    #13
  14. I've seen that same memory limit, 1.7mb, while trying to import
    very large IGS models (last occurence was with sw2001
    or 2001+). A general Windows limit, I suppose.
    It doesn't seem that physical memory is relevant to
    the problem.

    bill
     
    bill allemann, Jan 1, 2004
    #14
  15. Doug

    Ken Guest

    It is a "per process" limitation of 2 GB. If you use Win XP, I believe that
    you can set a 3 GB switch to allow up to 3 GB of memory per process.
     
    Ken, Jan 1, 2004
    #15
  16. Yes, you can set the 3GB switch, and it really works if you have the
    physical RAM. I am not sure about the virtual memory, though - we will try
    to test that sometime this month, I think.
    Just remember - do not enable the switch without getting the patch first!
    XP, SP1 will not reboot at all if the /3GB modification has been made
    without also doing the patch. There was a thread on this back in October
    that gives explicit detail on exactly what to do.
     
    Edward T Eaton, Jan 2, 2004
    #16
  17. As I mentioned earlier, Greg Jankowski's article will be address performance
    issues in this months Cadalyst, including this 3 GB switch. On a side note,
    the next version of XP (Windows XP 64) will be able to access 16 GB of
    memory on board and 16 TB of virtual memory. I remember the days when 640
    KB was huge and an extra 1 MB on an expansion card was high end, back then
    people would have ask what GB meant, not to mention TB!

    Keith
     
    Keith Streich, Jan 5, 2004
    #17
  18. OK, I was mislead. He doesn't have an article in this month's (January
    2004) Cadalyst and his online article in Cadalyst is about using toolbox on
    a network. I was hoping his performance list would be documented soon for
    all to review. I would list them myself in this newsgroup, but my notes
    were rather messy and specific for my needs.

    Sorry for the misinformation,
    Keith Streich
     
    Keith Streich, Jan 9, 2004
    #18
  19. OK, I was mislead. He doesn't have an article in this month's (January
    2004) Cadalyst and his online article in Cadalyst is about using toolbox on
    a network. I was hoping his performance list would be documented soon for
    all to review. I would list them myself in this newsgroup, but my notes
    were rather messy and specific for my needs.

    Sorry for the misinformation,
    Keith Streich
     
    Keith Streich, Jan 9, 2004
    #19
  20. Doug

    Aaron Guest

    Keith,

    Could you post a link to the Toolbox on the network article.
    I can't seem to find it.

    Thanks,

    Aaron
     
    Aaron, Jan 9, 2004
    #20
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.