ENTERING SURVEYOR COORDINATES TO INPUT PROPERTY BOUNDARIES

Discussion in 'AutoCAD' started by J B Z, Jul 2, 2003.

  1. J B Z

    J B Z Guest

    HELLO,
    IN EITHER ACAD 2002 OR ADT 3.3 (OR 2004) IS THERE A WAY TO ENTER SURVEYOR
    COORDINATE INFO TO DRAW LINES OF A PROPERTY: SUCH AS 'NORTHING COORDINATES'
    LIKE...(479.30' @ N 80° 10'09"E) ETC...??

    THANKS FOR ANY HELP,
    -J
     
    J B Z, Jul 2, 2003
    #1
  2. J B Z

    R.K. McSwain Guest

    Note: The units DO NOT have to be set any certain way to enter polar coordinates.
     
    R.K. McSwain, Jul 3, 2003
    #2
  3. J B Z

    Allen Jessup Guest

    You mean that if the units are set to architectural that you will still get
    a 439.30 foot line with the example below?

    Allen
     
    Allen Jessup, Jul 3, 2003
    #3
  4. J B Z

    R.K. McSwain Guest

    You will get a 439.30 "unit" long line. AutoCAD doesn't know or care about what that "unit" is. True, if you are in Arch units and then turn around and list this line, it will report 36'-7", but that's just AutoCAD *reporting* the line in Feet/Inches because you set the units to Arch. The line is still 439 "units" long, those units just happen to be inches.

    My main point was that you do not have to set your angle type to "surveyor's units" in order to enter polar coordinates.
     
    R.K. McSwain, Jul 3, 2003
    #4
  5. J B Z

    Paul Turvill Guest

    .... or just 439.9' -- the foot symbol automatically does the *12 if you're
    using architectural (inch) units.
    ___

    I wanted a 439.9 foot line,
     
    Paul Turvill, Jul 8, 2003
    #5
  6. J B Z

    R.K. McSwain Guest

    True.
     
    R.K. McSwain, Jul 8, 2003
    #6
  7. J B Z

    Tom Smith Guest

    Trivia ... the reason surveyors assume their "units" are feet, whereas
    architects assume they're inches, goes way back to when AutoCAD didn't allow
    input of decimal feet, when using "architectural" units. If you wanted to
    enter a number like 439.9, you had to be in "decimal" units. So
    civil/surveying types assumed feet to be their units, in order to work with
    decimals. It was just a workaround to a shortcoming of the program. Hasn't
    really been necessary to work that way for several versions, but people
    still do what they're used to, and architect's drawings are always 12 times
    as large as civil drawings :)

    It's still one keystroke faster per bearing to leave off the "foot"
    apostrophe, and scale the whole thing up by 12 if you want it architectural
    size.
     
    Tom Smith, Jul 8, 2003
    #7
  8. J B Z

    OLD-CADaver Guest

    >It would have worked out much better to have all the unit settings default to feet and just do the conversion of the decimal portion of the foot to inches for architectural and decimal inches for engineering. <<

    Machinists would have loved that.
     
    OLD-CADaver, Jul 8, 2003
    #8
  9. J B Z

    Sbaumer Guest

    We still use inches on surveys down here in Nawlins(drafting only, not
    field). Old french deeds are in feet.inches.lines, 8 lines equals 1 inch.
    10.75 feet eqauls on survey>> 10.9.0 Kinda strange but this is still
    being used in most of New Orleans

    Sbaumer
     
    Sbaumer, Jul 9, 2003
    #9
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.