Dimension Extension Linetype

Discussion in 'AutoCAD' started by Randy Smith, Feb 10, 2004.

  1. Randy Smith

    Randy Smith Guest

    Does anybody know how to change the linetype of a dimension extension
    without exploding the dimension?

    ie: Changing it to "center" for dimensioning centerlines of beams, columns,
    etc.
     
    Randy Smith, Feb 10, 2004
    #1
  2. Randy Smith

    Paul Turvill Guest

    Autodesk has turrned a deaf ear on requests for this ability since the very
    beginning. There's simply no good way to do it, unless you either draw the
    extension line as a separate entity or use one of the third-party kludges
    available (all of which will revert to the original continuous linetype if
    the dimension is moved or edited).
    ___
     
    Paul Turvill, Feb 10, 2004
    #2
  3. Randy Smith

    Vadim Guest

    You can do that though your plot style settings.

     
    Vadim, Feb 10, 2004
    #3
  4. Randy Smith

    Paul Turvill Guest

    Not unless you have a version of AutoCAD I've never seen before ...
    ___
     
    Paul Turvill, Feb 10, 2004
    #4
  5. Randy Smith

    Vadim Guest

    just plain 2000

     
    Vadim, Feb 10, 2004
    #5
  6. Randy Smith

    ffejgreb Guest

    Enlighten us.
     
    ffejgreb, Feb 10, 2004
    #6
  7. Randy Smith

    Gordon Price Guest

    I think vadim is talking about making the extension lines have a different
    color, then mapping a linetype to that color in the CTB. Problem there is it
    applies to BOTH extension lines. I find that I have only one center
    dimension as often as I have two. It would be nice to see independent
    control of linetype. Better yet, have the linetype actually change based on
    what is dimensioned. If I attach my dim at a center or quadrant osnap I get
    a centerline, otherwise I get continuous. FOr that matter I would like
    dimensions that don't fit between extension lines to switch to center
    justified vertically as well as getting a leader. The autoleader is useless
    what I still have to make other dimvar edits.
    But both are probably wishful thinking. Fixing old problems is never as
    important as implamenting new features, at least when marketing runs the
    show.

    Gordon
     
    Gordon Price, Feb 10, 2004
    #7
  8. Randy Smith

    Vadim Guest

    Here's the way: in your CTB file pick a color and assign a centerline
    linetype to it. In your dim style pick that color for your extension line.
    Your would not see that C/L on the screen, it only visible on a hard copy.
     
    Vadim, Feb 10, 2004
    #8
  9. Randy Smith

    Tom Smith Guest

    But both are probably wishful thinking. Fixing old problems is never as
    I agree on nearly all your points. I'd guess that architects probably have
    more varied needs relative to dimension styles than most other Acad users.
    For me, what Acad provides is just barely adequate for the simplest cases,
    and beyond that you have to fudge and twiddle to get what you want.

    As far as the extension linetype, as Paul said, it's not to hard to change
    them individually via a lisp, but like anything else non-kosher that you do
    to a dimension, it goes away as soon as you edit or update the dimension.
    I've tried working that way, and it's more troublesome than suppressing the
    extension and drawing a separate centerline.
     
    Tom Smith, Feb 10, 2004
    #9
  10. Randy Smith

    OLD-CADaver Guest

    And just drawing the centerline and dimensioning to it is way too much trouble.
     
    OLD-CADaver, Feb 10, 2004
    #10
  11. Randy Smith

    Talsky Guest

    you have a sense of humor...:)

    Jack Talsky



    trouble.
     
    Talsky, Feb 11, 2004
    #11
  12. Randy Smith

    OLD-CADaver Guest

    you have a sense of humor...:)<

    I'm glad you see it that way, most think I'm just a fecal sphincter.
    ;-)
     
    OLD-CADaver, Feb 11, 2004
    #12
  13. Randy Smith

    OLD-CADaver Guest

    Sorry Anne.
     
    OLD-CADaver, Feb 11, 2004
    #13
  14. Randy Smith

    Anne Brown Guest

    It was removed.

     
    Anne Brown, Feb 11, 2004
    #14
  15. Randy Smith

    Tom Smith Guest

    And just drawing the centerline and dimensioning to it is way too much
    trouble.

    Well, how troublesome it seems to me depends on the context. If the
    centerline has a kind of independent existence, like a structural grid line
    or a finish floor datum line, it doesn't bother me to draw it separately and
    pop dimensions to it. I usually need to suppress the extensions that lie on
    the centerline, to avoid obscuring its linetype.

    (I'd add to Gordon's pie-in-the-sky wish list: it would be nice to have an
    option to automatically suppress extension lines when the entire length of
    the extension lies along another object anyway.)

    But like Gordon, I often have a string of dimensions that might include one
    or more extensions that ought to be centerlines, but I seldom need both
    extensions of any one dimension to be centerlines. In that case, it is a
    small annoyance to have to replace the extension with a separate line.

    Same with the leader line, like he said. We wind up drawing a separate
    leaders in order to control their appearance, to avoid fighting with
    dimvars. Now that we're accustomed/spoiled to associative dimensions that do
    useful things for us, it's a mild nuisance to have to include disassociated
    objects in a dimension string.

    While I can see that it might be hard to add "conditional" functionality to
    dimvars (like changing vertical justification if the dim text doesn't fit,
    or changing extension linetypes by context), I can't understand why
    independent control of extension linetypes hasn't yet been provided. As Paul
    said, it's an ancient wish list item.
     
    Tom Smith, Feb 11, 2004
    #15
  16. Randy Smith

    Graeme Guest

    I was kinda thinking that myself.
    But the question was asked so... how about just making a block of the
    appropriate line type and using that as your arrowheads.

    Graeme


    trouble.
     
    Graeme, Feb 11, 2004
    #16
  17. Randy Smith

    OLD-CADaver Guest

    Okay, different tack...

    Let's say the wish comes true, you now have that ability. What's the function?

    Changing the linetype after the dim is placed with some edit tool, then suppressing the extension line of the continuing dim? Sounds heavy handed. Creating a unique dimstyle doesn't sound much lighter.

    LEt's think about the current solution, place a separate line on the right layer for the right linetype, stopping it 1/4" short of the dimline location and dimension to that endpoint as normal.

    Other than making the element part of the dimension, I see little advantage, considering that usually Col grids need to extend well past the far col. line and usually extend well past the dimline and certers of circles can be quickly "lined" with DIMCENTER and a little customization.

    But hey, that's just me.
     
    OLD-CADaver, Feb 11, 2004
    #17
  18. Randy Smith

    Paul Turvill Guest

    A simple pair of DIMVARs, similar to DIMSE1 and DIMSE2; e.g., DIMELT1 and
    DIMELT2 (for DIMension Extension LineType 1 and 2). These could be used in
    override fashion just like other DIMVARs. Of course, if that ever happens,
    I'll be out the price of an upgrade ...
    ___

    function?
     
    Paul Turvill, Feb 11, 2004
    #18
  19. Randy Smith

    Tom Smith Guest

    Let's say the wish comes true, you now have that ability. What's the
    function?

    I was thinking along Paul's lines, another pair of overrides that could be
    controlled through Properties. If you can suppress them, you ought to be
    able to control their linetypes as well.

    In practice, having the element as part of the dimension would be an
    advantage when it's part of a dimension string containing mixed extension
    types -- i.e. face of wall to centerline of window to face of wall, etc.
    Column grids I'd probably prefer to draw separately anyway for the reasons
    you mention.
     
    Tom Smith, Feb 11, 2004
    #19
  20. Randy Smith

    OLD-CADaver Guest

    But what have you gained, production-wise? To me it just seems easier to place the line than to run around overriding this one and suppressing that one and "oops updated the wrong one", etc.
     
    OLD-CADaver, Feb 11, 2004
    #20
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.