composer schematics / virtuoso layout editor support on mac osX

Discussion in 'Cadence' started by stroller, Apr 28, 2005.

  1. stroller

    stroller Guest

    hi all

    anyone know if/when cadence will port to osX? my dual boot pc is starting to
    get long in the tooth...
     
    stroller, Apr 28, 2005
    #1
  2. I guess you don't recall how long people were complaining about there
    being no Linux port. Until the big customers want a platform supported,
    there is no reason for any EDA vendor to support it. The cost to port,
    test and distribute for another platform is fairly high. People don't
    realize just how much is involved. You might, most don't have a clue.

    Linux at least had the advantage that the hardware is relatively cheap
    and there are a lot of compatible boxes out there. MacOS runs on what
    percentage of machines? 5% is what I saw in the newspaper recently. The
    rest run Windows with the potential to run Linux, or are running Linux.

    I won't argue the relative merit of operating systems because it does
    not matter how good or bad they are. Personally, I like MacOS much more
    than Windows. It all comes down to customer demand and return on
    investment. Get the companies that buy thousands of licenses to ask for
    MacOS and you may see it in your lifetime.
     
    Diva Physical Verification, Apr 28, 2005
    #2
  3. Now, _that_ would be some kind of PCR !!!
     
    Svenn Are Bjerkem, Apr 28, 2005
    #3
  4. That's not very expensive compared to the license fees. A dual 2.7GHz
    PowerMac with 30" Monitor cost more, but is far better than any other
    hardware available, remember we are designers, and designers use Mac.
    Andrew, isn't that an offer you can't refuse? ;)
     
    Svenn Are Bjerkem, May 12, 2005
    #4
  5. It's always cheap to implement something. Where it bites you is when
    you have to support it... :)
     
    David Cuthbert, May 12, 2005
    #5
  6. If it gets too much work, then open-source it and leave it up to your
    customers to port to the platform he likes best. That's an even crazier
    solution. :)
     
    Svenn Are Bjerkem, May 12, 2005
    #6
  7. Sure. We call it OpenAccess.

    Some assembly required. :)
     
    David Cuthbert, May 12, 2005
    #7
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.