CAD in creative design, problem solving

Typical Banquer Babble from an imbecile who's entire "design"
experience consists of watching Youtube videos and canned demos.

 

The bullshit goes on and on from worthless motherfuckers who can't
back up what they have to say with FACTS.

It is a FACT that with history based solid modeling you better be damn
sure you have a good idea of what you want before you start modeling
because it's next to impossible to radically change your mind without
having to start all over from scratch.

This limitation doesn't exist with direct modeling.

History based modeling is an approx 25 year old dated concept
popularized by PTC (Pro/E).

It's time to move on to better CAD tools than history based solid
modelers. Smarter CADCAM users are starting to do just that.

 

If you dont know what your designing, doodle using an etchasketch - no
history & turn it over & start again.

limitation? its an asset most of the time, unless your a scatter brain
& forget MAJOR design features. Its like rolling your life back in
time - do over's are allowed. -WTF is so bad about that? hitting the
rewind button & pausing - doing more work till you get it right & your
model doeskin blow up mainly because of poor modeling habits of the
user. Guess you never played chess? being able to think a few steps
ahead eh?

Still good today last I checked. Just like UG & Cimatron.

And just where EXACLTY would that move be too?
Better yet, just go NOW! & stop wasting everyone's time here.
We are all tired of it JON! just go away - erase your "history" have
fun in CAD/CAM wonderland. Come back when you learn how to interact
with people of different ideas, be a civil human being and actually
add useful information to help others in this group.

All in favor say I..........................

motion carried

Get TF on little dogie.

Lord knows "We" all tried


siyanara

 

The bullshit goes on and on from worthless motherfuckers who can't
back up what they have to say with FACTS.

It is a FACT that with history based solid modeling you better be damn
sure you have a good idea of what you want before you start modeling
because it's next to impossible to radically change your mind without
having to start all over from scratch.

This limitation doesn't exist with direct modeling.

History based modeling is an approx 25 year old dated concept
popularized by PTC (Pro/E).

It's time to move on to better CAD tools than history based solid
modelers. Smarter CADCAM users are starting to do just that.

 

Jon, your logic seems a bit odd and your statement reads as if it came
from someone who has never actually designed anything. How can you
model something if you don't first have a good idea or understanding
of what it is you're trying to create?

 

The bullshit goes on and on from worthless motherfuckers who can't
back up what they have to say with FACTS.

It is a FACT that with history based solid modeling you better be damn
sure you have a good idea of what you want before you start modeling
because it's next to impossible to radically change your mind without
having to start all over from scratch.

This limitation doesn't exist with direct modeling.

History based modeling is an approx 25 year old dated concept
popularized by PTC (Pro/E).

It's time to move on to better CAD tools than history based solid
modelers. Smarter CADCAM users are starting to do just that.

 

Jon, how can you model something if you don't first have a good idea
or understanding
of what it is you're trying to create?

 

Don't ask Jon the, "tough questions", it interferes with his buzzwords!

 

The bullshit goes on and on from worthless motherfuckers who can't
back up what they have to say with FACTS.

It is a FACT that with history based solid modeling you better be damn
sure you have a good idea of what you want before you start modeling
because it's next to impossible to radically change your mind without
having to start all over from scratch.

This limitation doesn't exist with direct modeling.

History based modeling is an approx 25 year old dated concept
popularized by PTC (Pro/E).

It's time to move on to better CAD tools than history based solid
modelers. Smarter CADCAM users are starting to do just that.

 

I'd wager they can all drill holes <smirk>.

2 1/2 axes yonnie (bunko) bonkers failed at even that.
Must be the chicken suit's fault, right?

 

What ever became of that rusting crapped-out junk?
Did he put wheels on it? A big chicken suit?

 

Yes, he is.

 

Nobody knows how he passed it .. he did not get
much farther in any case.

 

You get eggs when you wanted bricks?

Fine chicken suit. Deluxe model?

 

Prior to PTC about all systems WERE direct explicit modelers.

BTW, the P is for "Parametric".

End of hstory lesson. And vocabulary lesson.

 

PTC's sales point was that it took little skill or training for
soomeone to do certain types of work.
While this did somewhat limit the types of work that could be
done well for many it was okay.

You now demand something for clueless morons like yourself.
Do they all have chicken suits?

 

If he designed a simple bridge ....
http://tsmo.pp.fi/kuvat/bridge-from-nowhere.jpg
http://www.cyclingscotland.org/cmsimages/Sustrans Connect 2 - Bridge to no-where_552_557.jpg

Those give him far, far too much credit.