Any Smarteam users here? (or reps) I have some questions.

Discussion in 'SolidWorks' started by SW Monkey, Dec 29, 2003.

  1. SW Monkey

    SW Monkey Guest

    Since there isnt any Smarteam group (that i know of, please post if
    there is), here are some questions ill post here.

    1. Why when you checkout a model, assy, or drawing it copies
    everything, including EVERY drawing for every model and sub-assy in a
    main assy.

    2. Why when you checkin or release a drawing, it goes through the
    entire assy(s) that are on the drawing. If you just change a note,
    why does all this have to happen? VERY SLOW!!

    3. If there are settings for the above, can we set them off?

    4. Can we implement the automatic titleblock easily?

    5. Why do I have to manually choose the designer and engineer fields
    when creating a number in Smarteam? These should be defaulted to
    whoever is logged into the current computer. (ex. my username, jblow,
    can be used to automattically choose myself as the designer, and jdoe
    as the Engineer).

    6. Can we use "Lightweight" parts with the current Smarteam?

    7. Can you have the most up-to-date assy ALWAYS have the most
    up-to-date models linked to it, no matter if someone did or didnt
    choose "Link to previous revision"? It doesn't make sense that
    someone would want an old model in the most up-to-date assy. Please
    explain if im wrong.

    8. Can we have the most-up-to-date model/drawing linked to each other
    ALWAYS? This doesnt make any sense why you wouldnt want the most
    up-to-date model with the current drawing. Please explain if im
    wrong.

    9. Why is there a view and work dir? Can we only use 1 directory?
    Sometimes when I view a assy, some files go into the view dir and some
    go into the work. Also, if im working on a top level assy, and
    someone else updates a sub-assy, and i want to update the sub-assy, i
    would then suppress the sub-assy, then copy the updated sub-assy, then
    unsuppress it. This works most of the time, but sometimes the copied
    file goes into the view dir, whereas the other copy is in the work dir
    (old copy). I then have to suppress the sub-assy, then delete both
    files from work and view. then copy the updated sub-assy again. It
    would be easier if you could right-click a part or assy, and choose
    "Update to existing file" or something like that.

    10. This doesn't happen often, but at least once a week. Sometimes
    when I goto check-in a drawing, the Smarteam window pops up, but its
    VERY small, about the size of the X box in the corner of the window.
    I then have to drag the window and make it bigger. It doesn't seem
    like Smarteam remembers the previous window size like most windows
    based programs do. I've even seen cases where the Smarteam window
    doesn't even show up on the screen, but its in the taskmanager has
    being loaded. When I click around on the screen, I get a "Server
    Busy" message. You also get this message when the window is very
    small like described above, but it goes away when you resize the
    window and click "OK".

    11. How can you use Toolbox parts with Smarteam? Is it possible to
    create a library outside of Smarteam for parts that never change, ie.
    screws, spacers, etc? This would allow you to use Toolbox, but when
    you checkin an assy that uses these parts, Smarteam would recognize it
    as a toolbox part, and not check it in. You could also have the parts
    in Smarteam, but Smarteam would have to know not try and save the
    parts when checking an assy in.
     
    SW Monkey, Dec 29, 2003
    #1
  2. SW Monkey

    Brian Lawson Guest

    Hi SW Monkey.

    Will try to help you, but first things first. What versions and SP's
    are you you using for both SWX and Smarteam.

    Cheers

    Brian
     
    Brian Lawson, Dec 30, 2003
    #2
  3. SW Monkey

    SW Monkey Guest

    Smarteam V5R10 SP10
    Solidworks 2003 SP5
     
    SW Monkey, Dec 30, 2003
    #3
  4. SW Monkey

    Rod Levin Guest

    In V5R10 this behavior is controled by the smasscls.ini file. You can
    use this file to determine which types of files come along. In V5R11
    and above, this is configured with a new configuration tool.
    SmarTeam validates all the relationships and dependancies, to assure
    that they are all captured, on any save.
    There are MANY settings the SmarTeam administrator can make to
    optimize performance for these lifecycle operations.
    Any attribute tracked by SmarTeam can be mapped to a value in the
    title block.
    This can be done as well, but probably using scripting.
    Not sure what you mean by this. If parts in an assembly are set to
    light weight, this status will be maintained.
    This is a bit complicated. When you save an assembly in SmarTeam it
    captures the relationships as they exist in SolidWorks. If the
    assembly, subassemblies and parts that have been changed are also used
    elsewhere, SmarTeam does not, by default replace all usages. To do
    this is risky because the changes made could remove or modify
    references required for the dependant assemblies to regenerate
    propperly. The way we recommend is for people to not "Link to previous
    revision" but configure the system to always use the latest version by
    default. This gives you the same result, but if the dependant
    relationships are broken due to the changes, you can still retrieve
    these assemblies as they were created. If you do "Link to previous
    version" you have lost the precise state of these assemblies as they
    existed when they were saved.
    Yes, as I explained above, the system can be set to always retrive the
    latest. The tricky part here is what do you mean by latest, the latest
    released, or including current revisions in process. This may be an
    easy choice in Engineering, but is it the same choice for the shop
    floor?
    I have to admit, this is confusing for me as well, but I can say it is
    much easier to manange in later versions of SmarTeam. The Local Files
    Explorer in R10 becomes the SmarTeam File Explorer in R11 and you can
    simply double click on a file to edit it.
    SmarTeam has had a problem with windows behind windows. You need to be
    aware of this. The particular problem you describe was present in one
    of the Service Packs of R10. Try running a more recient one, they are
    up to SP10. It is important to have everyone update service packs
    togehter for the most consisitant performance.
    Yes. The behavior, check in or just track is dependant on how the
    system is configured. To get the behavior you want, there will have to
    be a separate class created for toolbox parts.

    Hope this helps clarify things.

    Rod Levin.
    InFlow Technology
    www.inflow-tech.com
     
    Rod Levin, Dec 31, 2003
    #4
  5. SW Monkey

    Brian Lawson Guest

    Ah! Rod beat me to it. I did not post answers first as I have not
    upgraded to R11 yet and I know there has been some major changes from
    R10.

    Anyway here's my tuppence worth on the subjects.

    1. This is how we have the smasscls.ini file setup. Drawings are
    dependant on both part and assembly files and are therefore reverse
    dependencies of part or assembly files. If you want to manage
    associations of mirrored, joined or base parts you will need to set up
    the entries for [Solidworks Part} like so.

    [SolidWorks Drawing]
    ass1=SolidWorks Part
    ass2=SolidWorks Assembly

    [SolidWorks Part]
    Ass1=SolidWorks Assembly
    Ass2=SolidWorks Part

    2/3. Just as Rod has said.
    When we installed Smarteam in July 99 we had a 16MB Token Ring Network
    setup with Novell (V4 I think). We only had 5 Smarteam users, but
    there was another dozen or so people using the network. It was very
    painful. We quickly installed a new Eithernet network (VERY
    EXPENSIVE) running NT4 (now W2K) with 100MB link dedicated to each
    user. Its very fast and reliable, (we now have 20 SWX/SMT users) maybe
    you need to analyse your network spec/traffic.

    4. Again just as Rod has pointed out. Did your Var not ask you what
    customisation you wanted?

    5. We opted not to write a script to do this instead we set-up Lookup
    Tables, give us more flexibility when things/people in the department
    change.

    6. Never use them although I know that SMT recognises them.

    7. Like Rod mentioned this one is a bit of a conundrum but I don't
    necessarily agree on this one, all depends on how you want to handle
    your revisions. If I read the question correctly I would say NO is the
    answer. We have a rule set-up that when you check in/release a
    revision the user always links to parents of previous revision. If a
    user has a file out for change, only that user has access to that
    revision, it is not available to the rest of the users until it is
    checked in/released. By doing link to parents of previous revision on
    check in/release you maintain an up to date structure. We found it
    very confusing if we did not do this, you end up with a spider's web
    of links that can be difficult to unravel. Also if you don't use link
    to parent of previous revision I fail to see how any search
    queries/where used queries would return the correct results.

    8. See above.

    9. I wondered about this to at the beginning but soon realised that
    the View directory is invaluable when viewing previous revisions,
    saving as iges, pdf ect. Say you want to view a previous revision of a
    drawing and you only have the Work folder set up but you have the
    latest revision in that directory, Haven't tried this but I can
    envisage 2 things that may happen, i. It will fail to copy the file
    ii. It will overwrite the latest revision. If you use the View folder
    like a temp folder you soon realise what its there for.

    10. Never had this particular problem, but I have SMT set-up to Auto
    Maximise. In SMT go to View; Options; General to get to this setting.

    11. We use Toolbox only to generate the hardware as needed and then
    save as our own Part Number. Toolbox is not the most agreeable piece
    of software to use at the best of times. I personally would not let it
    near SMT.

    Hope this helps

    Cheers

    Brian

    All the best for the new year when it comes, I'm of to the pub (glug
    glug glug).
     
    Brian Lawson, Dec 31, 2003
    #5
  6. SW Monkey

    Tony Guest

    There is a newsgroup now for Smarteam users, try
    http://groups.msn.com/SMARTEAM/_memberprofile.msnw?user=SmarteamUser✓&pps=k
    I am not using SmarTeam in my current job, so I din't go there at the
    moment.

    One of the problems we had at my last job, was that there was only one Vault
    and we had 12000 files in it, so everything took an age to happen. When I
    got control, I created a Vault for each project, which was much better.

    We used Standard Parts instead of Toolbox and found that it worked very well
    with SMT. Just make sure you have the correct information in each
    configuration of parts with multiple configs. I used Visual Basic to create
    my configs and to populate the Config Properties.

    Regards
    Tony O'Hara
     
    Tony, Jan 2, 2004
    #6
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.