Amd dual processor any good for Solidworks with Pdmworks?

Discussion in 'SolidWorks' started by pete, Jul 5, 2005.

  1. pete

    pete Guest

    I have been given £2500 ex vat to spend on a new rig.
    I don't need a dvdrom, keyboard, mouse or a monitor, so this is for a box of
    bits, lol
    So I was thinking of getting a Nvidia FX3000 and plonking this in Amd 64 r
    Dual processor system with 4Gb ram and windows XP64.
    Now I know that the 6800Gt is a gaming card, but what if this was 2x
    6800gt's in SLI mode, would this be a better set-up than the fx3000 on it's
    own?
     
    pete, Jul 5, 2005
    #1
  2. pete

    SWX-VAR-JP Guest

    Dual procesors are nice, but they will do you no good for either as
    neither one is multithreaded.
     
    SWX-VAR-JP, Jul 5, 2005
    #2
  3. pete

    pete Guest

    Thank you for the reply, so what would you recommend?
     
    pete, Jul 5, 2005
    #3
  4. pete

    SWX-VAR-JP Guest

    I would go ahead and get them if you have the budget. They will allow
    you to work faster with other programs opened at the same time as
    SolidWorks. And stick with the fx3000.
     
    SWX-VAR-JP, Jul 5, 2005
    #4
  5. pete

    matt Guest


    That's an overly simplistic answer.

    Different components of SolidWorks do benefit from multithreading to
    different extents. It changes with release, without official notice
    usually. Photoworks will certainly benefit, any Cosmos Express you run
    will too, and probably Moldflow Express, some assembly operations. To
    say there's no benefit is not correct, although for some operations
    there's not much, and for others there's a significant benefit.

    For PDMW, I would go to the SW subscription forum and ask Joy Garon
    about multithreading specifically.

    matt
     
    matt, Jul 5, 2005
    #5
  6. pete

    pete Guest

    Thnak you, I have sent a request to Joy
    Fingers crossed :)
     
    pete, Jul 5, 2005
    #6
  7. pete

    TOP Guest

    SW does not in general utilize a dual processor. FrodoWorks does. The
    only thing I can think of that this setup might help with is to run SW
    on one processor and PDMWorks on the other. But then you will run into
    RAM issues because until SW runs under XP64 you will be limited to the
    3Gb. If you vault is so large that running PDMWorks on such a fast
    processor make sense it will limit your available RAM for SW. Catch22.

    If you are planning for the future, put in a dual capable mobo but
    with a single Opteron 286 or better. Then when XP64 comes out and
    assuming you can get your hands on it get the second CPU or more RAM.
    Tyan makes some nice dual capable mobos that will hold much more RAM
    than the current crop of high performance single CPU boards.

    I think there was one post a while back using the Dual gaming cards in
    SLI mode. He was just a squeak faster than my AMD64 FX53 with FX3000.
    So the FX3000 or similar CAD rated graphics card might make more sense.
     
    TOP, Jul 5, 2005
    #7
  8. pete

    ken Guest

    Go Dual Core with a single processor die. All the benefits of Dual
    processors, but not the cost. The only downside is if you have two heavy
    handed applications running at the same time or one heavy duty
    multi-threaded app, there is only one bus handling all the traffic.

    Ken
     
    ken, Jul 6, 2005
    #8
  9. pete

    P. Guest

    You hit the nail on the head. I/O. SW is very I/O intensive. PDMWorks is
    also. So is FrodoWorks. To me dual core is the Celeron solution for multi
    processing. I run NENastran which is very hard on memory with SW which is
    hard on CPUs. If I was going multi it would certainly be on a dual mobo.
     
    P., Jul 6, 2005
    #9
  10. pete

    MM Guest

    Beppe,

    The same as "what" ???

    The performance "should" be the same when running things like benchmarks.

    Once you get into heavy multithreaded applications, or running two heavy
    applications concurrently, the dual processor machine will smoke the dual
    core. It's an issue of bandwith external to the CPU.

    Regards

    Mark
     
    MM, Jul 6, 2005
    #10
  11. pete

    TOP Guest

    Was this test using SW2006 or an earlier version?
     
    TOP, Jul 6, 2005
    #11
  12. pete

    TOP Guest

    I use ECC RAM in my system and so far only one person has posted any
    faster times. It is fully 20% faster than any Intel system I have seen.
    And the ECC brings another time saving benefit in fewer crashes due to
    memory corruption.

    The AMD 64 FX53 I used is far faster in real world work than any of the
    Intel boxes at work (up to 3.4GHz Dell) that I get all the big
    drawings and really large assemblies to work on. That is the down side.
    Big jobs seek the fastest machine.
     
    TOP, Jul 7, 2005
    #12
  13. pete

    TOP Guest

    I use Registered ECC RAM in my system and so far only one person has
    posted any
    faster times and he has a similar setup with a new chip. It is fully
    20% faster than any Intel system I have seen. And the Registered ECC
    RAM brings another time saving benefit in fewer crashes due to memory
    corruption.

    The AMD 64 FX53 I used is far faster in real world work than any of
    the
    Intel boxes at work (up to 3.4GHz Dell) that I get all the big
    drawings and really large assemblies to work on. That is the down
    side.
    Big jobs seek the fastest machine.

    AMD is faster on benchmarks and real world.
     
    TOP, Jul 7, 2005
    #13
  14. pete

    TOP Guest

    I haven't, but there was one guy who beat my system with one of these
    newer chips. He only beat it by a small margin. If I can run Ship in a
    Bottle in 18 seconds for 50 iterations with Fast Image Quality it will
    take quite a big jump to better that by much.
     
    TOP, Jul 8, 2005
    #14
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.